'States almost universally resist the close approach of hostile powers and alliances toward their borders.' The Kremlin is following 'the NUPIMBY principle - No Unfriendly Powers in My Backyard,' says Stephen Van Evera, an international relations scholar at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Russian president has indicated that, in parallel fashion, he is not willing to tolerate NATO troops, tanks, missiles and warplanes in Ukraine.

Kennedy was willing to tolerate Soviet missiles in Cuba. We would never tolerate it, any more than President John F. Suppose that Mexico were to enter an alliance that put Russian or Chinese troops on its soil to deter U.S. Putin's posture is hardly evidence of Hitler-like ambitions. Two years later, though, the Berlin Wall came down. When Ronald Reagan signed a 1987 treaty banning intermediate-range nuclear missiles from Europe, angry conservatives compared him to.

But that didn't stop him from invading Afghanistan or Iraq.Īs for 'appeasement,' diplomacy requires compromise, and not every compromise is the moral equivalent of surrender. Bush was forced to issue a meek apology to China in 2001 after an American military plane collided with a Chinese fighter and crash-landed on a Chinese island, where its crew was held hostage. Bill Clinton pulled out of Somalia but intervened in Bosnia. leaves one conflict or avoids another doesn't mean it will follow the same course in another place or at another time.

Ufc funny cartoon video francis cain